48 ARTICLE / MAKALE Ta mh i sb i er en dt ut ec emsp tehrea t ua ruex i ltihaer yr ec -ocni rscuuml apt itoi onn abi ry r uapt i ot oi s0 .c9o nMt rWo l.l e d . Examples-reduction of auxiliary power consumption-3 Conclusion: New Operation concepl Operallon dlagram TG1 • 320 'C ·--�--· * d --- •• - reductlon of FD-fan consumptlon of up to 0,9 MW Figııre 8: Exaıııple reduction ofauxiliary power consunıptioıı-Conclusion 4. References in the last years, seven ECOIRAM projects have been carried wo uetr. ePilnavnet ss t wi g ai tthe dv .e ri ny da ilfi fecraesnets dtehsei gpnl aannt sd woepreer avtei or yn wc oenl ld i t i o n s maintained and operated. References 1 Vattenfall Euro e German 2 DSK-lbbenb0ren Germen 5. Results Janschwalde 2001 as 2002 2003 2003 2003 2004 2005 c hin o a v m th e p e a b f r e o a e l b lo n le w g i e p n n r g o e j ar e a n c t te o s d v . e i a n r n v d t i h e ew ro p u is r g oh g j l e i y v c e t e s n v a 2 o 0 l n u 8a t t h i e m e d p r i e r n o s vu a e l n t m s e e oa n f r tl f y iv i d se e t a s ge. ldeas-Potentlals-lmprovement measures -Plant Deslgn -market -fuel 582 Baslc ldeas in EJ s i C m it a p e t r a olovgeumeeonft measures assessment Technical + commer benchmarking Tools 208 Projeci lidne5asProjects .fil. 46 impErocvoenmo me ni ct Wm ei tah sruerseusl t i n g NPV> 100 M€ Figııre 10: Overvicw on idcııtifıcd inıproveıııeııt nıeasurcs ENERJİ & KOJENERASYON DÜNYASI e Bp l h a a a s b s e o e d r a o o te r n d h t a h in v is e d 4 e a 6 l t r a e i i m a l d a p y n ro d bv e a e e r m e n e p i n m r t e p m s le e e m n a t s l e y u n r t i e n e s d t . h h e T a h v i e m e p N b l e e P e m V n e (nNteattion mP reeasseunrteVs aisl uaed) doifntgh eu pf i nt oa nmc ioarlebtehnaenf i t1 0o0f tMh e€.improvement sPuamybmaacrkizpeedriiondFini vestment costs and Net Present value are gure 11 for several improvement measures. cTahteegimorpireosv:ement measures can be grouped in two O lamlspororveement measures which have a very high benefit but quire a significant investment O rlme apl irzoevdemwei tnht vmeerya sliuttrleesinwviethstmhigehnt bceonsetf. it t h a t c a n be The impact on CO2 emissions trading has been calculated taackci on ug n7t . €T/hEi sU Af u ratsh evr a rl ue ed uocfetsh et h ee mpiasys bi oanc kc epret i rf ii oc ad t eosf ti hn et o t b im h y e p i r m i o m v p p e ro r m o v v e in e n g m t m e e x n e i t s a t ps in o u g s r e s p i s b l . a i l n T it t o ie s s b i te a n i n s e d f o i f t t h f h e o i gr r m h e s i t m p h e e p c ot e i r v t m a e n i s c c s o e io s n t t o s . t kr T a n o d o i w ng h C e O lp the plant owner to get a comprehensive overview on the 2 reduction possibilities of his planı a special product CO2Cut based on the ECOI RAM approach but focusing on CO2 reduction measures bas been developed. ECOI RAM improvement measures impact of CO2 emissions trading 6Owlo CO2 tradlng t? e w CO2 tradlng 7€/EUA " >, 4 o. -g :�� � l ;/ıj .5 500 1500 2500 3500 4500 5500 8500 -1 lnvestment cost k€ + Many C02 -reduction measures are economical without C02-trading + Knowing the technical feasible measures is key Figııre 11: lıııpact ofCO 2 eıııissioıı ures s tradiııg on inıprovenıent nıeas6. Summary O The methodology ECOjRAM for improvement of existing wp liat hn tds ifhfearse nbte ceon nadpi tpi ol inesd assu cec. ge .s spf ul al lnyt idn essei gvne, r aml aprrkoej et c t s environment, fuel, operation mode O m cB o a a n s in s e u t d e m n op a n t n io t c w n e o t c h e o e x s ta b s m a a s p n i l c e d s p tr h s o e h c o e r w e d d i u n u r g e c t t i i h o s e n e r o x e p f d l a a u u c in x t e i i o l d i n a . r oyfpower O mThoereNtehtaPnr1e0se0nMt V€alue of the savings in five projects was O CO2 trading generally reduces the payback period of the identified improvement measures. 4
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTcyMTY=